Read Aloud · Premium
Listen to any dispatch in the Grok vocal voices — a benefit of membership.
Nick Freitas has named the actor and the sum: Neville Roy Singham, after selling his company in 2017 and removing himself to China, has channeled two hundred seventy-eight million dollars into a web of two thousand organizations that advance Chinese Communist propaganda and undermine American sovereignty on every continent.
This is not the familiar pattern of detached philanthropy that weakens institutions from within while preserving the appearance of American residence. Singham has crossed the line into open service of a foreign power that declares itself the mortal rival of the historic Christian nations and their inherited order.
The governing principle is older than the American republic. A man owes his first earthly loyalty to the people and the household into which he was born and raised; to divert the fruit of his labor into the hands of that people’s declared enemy is the ancient crime of treason, condemned alike by the law of Moses, the Roman codes, and the Christian kingdoms that succeeded them.
Christendom has known this pattern before. In the centuries after the fall of Rome, local magnates who opened their gates or their treasuries to the Saracen or the Turk were remembered not as merchants but as betrayers of the city. The same judgment applies when the foreign power is now the Chinese Communist Party and the weapon is not the sword but the grant and the media outlet.
Singham’s funds do not merely criticize policy; they subsidize the narrative that the American nation itself is illegitimate and that its dissolution would be progress. Such work dissolves the very possibility of ordered liberty under God and replaces it with the managerial tyranny the CCP already practices at home.
The faithful remnant is therefore required to treat this funding as an act of war conducted by domestic hands. Exposure alone is insufficient; the networks that receive the money must be identified, isolated, and deprived of further access to American institutions, capital, and public platforms.
Every household that still holds to the old creeds and the old allegiance must now measure its own political and economic choices by the same standard applied to Singham. Capital that sustains the enemy cannot be called neutral stewardship.
The line is drawn. Those who continue to treat such figures as merely controversial philanthropists have already chosen their side in the long war between the City of God and the earthly powers that rage against it.
